The literary text is seen as the communication between the author and the reader. When the author uses the discourse to actualize the experiences of what is happening around or inside them. Descriptive discourse is the flexible discourse genre, the multifunctional social entity. The discourse research the “dynamic” not only personal thoughts and attitudes are realized, but the moral standards and social ideologies of the community are also clearly realized. The approach, that examines the discourse in the performing process of communication functions concretized through the text. Especially, the role of descriptive discourse in realizing the experiential function related to the context Field through the argument process. Using the Systemic Functional Grammar theory along with the discourse analysis and the semantic analysis methods helps us explain and extract the functional characteristics in the sociocultural context and the situational context to recognize the discourse in all functional aspects.If descriptive discourse is used flexibly in communication, it not only helps the user understand the beauty of a language but also has interesting insights into the linguistic culture of a nation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
REFERENCES
Anthony, B. J. (2011), Informal logic and its early historical development, University of Windsor, Studies in Logic, Vol.4, No.1(2011):1–16.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1990), Politeness - Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (2014), Linguistic and socio-pragmatic considerations in legislative drafting, The Theory Practice of Legislation, 2(2), 169-183.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013), “The functional analysis of English”, A Hallidayan approach: Routledge.
Cook, G. (1996), Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M. (1977), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, London: Longman.
Crystal, D. (1992), Introducing Linguistics, London: Penguin.
David, H. (2014). Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of Johnson, R. H. & Blair, J. A. (2000). Informal logic: An overview, 93-99.
Dijk, T. A. (1989), Structures of Discourse and Structures of power,In J.A, Anderson (Ed.), Communication. Yearbook 12, pp. 18-59. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
Freeman, J. B. (1990), Critical Study: Walton's Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Informal Logic XII.2, Spring 1990: 87-105
Grice, H. P. (1975), Logic and conversation, In Cole, P., and J.L. Morgan, eds. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58).
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985), Language, context and text: A social semiotic perspective, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar, (Third ed.) London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th e.). New York: Routledge.
Harris, Z. S. (1952), Discourse Analysis, Jerry Fodor & Jerrold Katz (Ed.)
Reed, C. & Walton, D. (2007), Argumentation Schemes in Dialogue, In H.V. Hansen, et. al.(Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM (pp. 1-11). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Johansen, J. D. (2002). Literary Discourse: A Semiotic-Pragmatic Approach to Literature, University of Toronto Press.
Kate, H. (1973), The logic of literary genres, Indiana University Press. Publication Date: 1973. First Edition. Translated from English by Vu Hoang Dich & Tran Ngoc Vuong, Hanoi National University Press. Publication year: 2004.
Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (2000), When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence-focus construction across languages, Studies in Language, 24 (3), 611-682.
Lemnitzer, L. & Zinsmeister, H. (2015). Korpuslinguistik. Eine Einführung (Corpus linguistics. An Introduction). Narr Francke.
Luu Van Lang (1998), Linguistics and Vietnamese, Social Science Publishing House, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Trinh Sam (2014), Linguistic theory and the identification of discourse features, Science Magazine, Hanoi National University, 1- 6.
Walton, D. (1996). Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Woods, J. (2004), The death of argument: fallacies in agent-based reasoning, Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-2663.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press
